Thursday, February 24, 2011

Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Buoyed by Insurance 'Float'

Article published on http://www.wsj.com/
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has spent tens of billions of dollars on railroads, machine tools and utility companies in recent years. But Mr. Buffett's 2010 annual letter, to be released Saturday, is likely to emphasize just how much Berkshire's core insurance business is still driving its growth.
Berkshire, where Mr. Buffett serves as chairman and chief executive, is likely to report improved fourth-quarter earnings and an increase in book value, a performance yardstick Mr. Buffett uses to measure the company's growth. Results will be buoyed by rising stock markets that helped Berkshire's large stock portfolio and its derivatives contracts.

The company's manufacturing and retail operations, and its February 2010 acquisition of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe, likely boosted net income, as did insurance underwriting. Berkshire's net earnings through the first nine months of 2010 totaled $8.6 billion, already exceeding reported net income for the whole of 2009.

Of importance, Berkshire's pool of funds from insurance—something known as "float"—could have swelled to roughly $67 billion at the end of 2010 from $63 billion a year earlier. It is poised to rise further in 2011 despite challenging insurance-market conditions amid the slow economy, analysts say.
This float is money Berkshire holds to pay insurance claims in the future, but in the meantime can be put to work in stocks and long-term investments that earn returns for Berkshire's own benefit. Effectively borrowed funds at little or no cost, Berkshire's float enables the company to acquire businesses and assets beyond what its equity capital alone would permit, Mr. Buffett has previously said.
Last year's growth in float occurred even though Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance Group, the giant reinsurer run by Ajit Jain, wrote its lowest level of property insurance to protect against hurricanes and other disasters in nearly a decade, as of Sept 30. As the broader market for commercial insurance extended a multiyear pricing slump, Berkshire limited the amount of catastrophe and individual risks it took because it didn't find premiums attractive enough.

Instead, the reinsurer acquired large books of long-term business from other insurers to bring in billions of dollars that Mr. Buffett and Berkshire's new investment manager Todd Combs can invest for many years—if not decades—before payouts have to be made. For example, Berkshire collected $2 billion in premiums last summer from a single asbestos and environmental-liabilities deal with insurer CNA Financial Corp., whose earnings had been hurt by liabilities from policies sold many years ago.

"Insurance companies that want to clean up parts of their balance sheet from historical woes often look to transact deals with Berkshire," said Bryon Ehrhart, chairman of reinsurance broker Aon Benfield's analytics division.

Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance Group also grew significantly in the business of life reinsurance, by taking over coverage on the lives of thousands of Americans. A contract with Swiss Reinsurance Co. that closed in early 2010 gave Berkshire a block of individual term-life reinsurance business. This likely brought in over $2 billion in life and annuity premiums for Berkshire last year, estimates Jay Gelb, an analyst at Barclays Capital.

More premiums will come in this year from a recent acquisition of the life-reinsurance business of Toronto-based Sun Life Financial Inc., which was one of the largest players in this space.
The life-reinsurance deals will enable Berkshire to collect potentially tens of billions of dollars in premiums over the next few decades, money that Messrs. Buffett and Combs will put to work.
Berkshire will have to make payouts if individual policyholders die during the covered periods, but that won't happen immediately.

"These are all float creation deals," said Paul Howard, director of research at Solstice Investment Research. The expectation is that above-average investment returns generated by Berkshire over the long term will ultimately outrun its insurance liabilities, he adds.

Investment returns, however, have fallen across many asset classes since the financial crisis, when Berkshire was able to use money from its insurance operations to scoop up high-yielding securities in such companies as Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and General Electric Co. Those aid packages have earned Berkshire double-digit annual returns, but much of the money is expected to be repaid by the companies this year.

In his widely followed annual letter this Saturday, Mr. Buffett may repeat an earlier warning he has given Berkshire investors: The outsize returns he made on those crisis-era investments are unlikely to be repeated.

Berkshire's insurance businesses, which also include auto insurer Geico Corp. and reinsurer General Re Corp., likely generated underwriting profits last year, meaning they made money from the insurance they sold before factoring in investment income.

As long as the insurance is profitable, any money made by Messrs. Buffett and Combs on the float from these businesses belongs entirely to Berkshire. Mr. Buffett has previously described this as investing using other people's money without having to pay interest on the borrowed funds. The recent reinsurance deals, however, aren't without risk.

The deal with CNA Financial transferred $1.6 billion in asbestos and environment-pollution net liabilities to Berkshire along with $2 billion in premiums. Called "retroactive reinsurance" because it covers losses that have already occurred but whose final costs aren't known, Berkshire will be on the hook for up to $4 billion in insurance payouts. But if this limit is hit, it will likely be years in the future, by which time Berkshire could have multiplied the money it collected, say analysts.

Berkshire reached a similar retroactive reinsurance deal in 2006 with Equitas, a company formed by underwriters at Lloyd's of London. Berkshire agreed to pay up to $13.9 billion in asbestos and environmental claims and expenses at Equitas in the years ahead in exchange for $7.1 billion in cash and securities up front.

Mr. Buffett told shareholders in 2007 that there was no guarantee the Equitas deal would earn Berkshire money in the long term. But, he wrote, "Ajit and I think the odds are in our favor. And should we be wrong, Berkshire can handle it."

The retroactive reinsurance deals typically require Berkshire to record accounting losses over a period of time. Unlike most public companies, Berkshire "is willing to take business that depresses reported profits" if it expects to generate large economic profits over the long run, says Tom Russo, a partner at Gardner Russo & Gardner, an asset manager that holds Berkshire stock.

Mr. Gelb of Barclays Capital says it will "take a fair amount of time for the profits to emerge, but [the deals] will enable Berkshire to build up a tremendous amount of wealth over time."

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Banks will demand bigger down payments


The subprime meltdown is living proof of the infinite number of systemic failures within mortgage origination practices applied by many, if not all of the lenders in the USA.
Today, WSJ’s Mitra Kalita presents us with a brief analysis on what could potentially be the uprising of a new mortgage origination era, one that could lead lenders and borrowers to act in a more responsible and conscious way.

Even though, some of you could argue that tougher loan origination policies may restrict credit accessibility for potential home buyers with little or no cash available, it’s also true that the recent subprime crisis was caused by both irresponsible lenders and borrowers that took advantage of the widely spread origination malpractice that allowed them to extensively profit either from lending money, debt securitization, speculating with properties' artificially increasing prices or from borrowing money that they could never pay back. Even though lenders, mortgage brokers, real estate agents, as well as sellers and buyers gained from such strategy, their actions consequently sparked a loss to us all.

I believe that the demand of bigger down payments will help strengthen our financial industry and will boost a sustainable growth in Real Estate markets across the USA. Certainly not everyone will profit or benefit from new responsible practices: housing markets will move slower, property inventories will suffer from smaller rotation and many of us will not be able to buy our dream home unless we actually have the means to do so (that’s not too bad, is it?).

Its common sense…which is in fact the less common of all our senses.
Not everyone will profit or benefit from responsible lending, but it is time to learn from mistakes of the past, to instead strengthen sustainable growth for all to benefit from.

Hope you like the reading:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703312904576146532935600542.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLETopStories#dummy


Santiago H.